Review of Video Frames from Oxford & McNay Collision In London Ontario

by | Mar 25, 2025 |

This video frame shows two pick-up trucks seconds before they collided on Oxford Street at McNay Street in London Ontario on the morning of March 24, 2025.

Those not accustomed to analysing the results of serious collisions were impressed with watching the video from a surveillance camera showing a collision that occurred at the intersection of Oxford Street and McNay Street in London, Ontario that occurred on the morning of March 24, 2025. Such videos are commonplace now as more roadways are covered by various video installations. The unusual aspect of this collision is that the offending driver was approaching a T-intersection at high speed and the traffic signal for his direction of travel was red. Even if the collision had not occurred the offending vehicle would have travelled through a chain-link fence and onto the grounds of the Blessed Sacrament Catholic School located on the south side of the intersection.

The four frames below were pulled from the video of a surveillance camera showing how the vehicles came together at impact.

This was a relatively severe collision as evidenced by the crush to the front end of the offending southbound pick-up truck and similar crush to the driver’s side of the other, eastbound pick-up.

At this early point-in-time no mention has been made why the southbound pick-up truck was travelling at high speed toward an intersection where his roadway came to an end. One viewer commented that the driver was known to travel at high speeds in the neighbourhood but it does not explain why the speeding would occur at a point where there was no where to go.

Modern motor vehicles are equipped with event data recorders, cameras and a variety of other on-board modules which can provide detailed information about how a collision occurred. Even so, defects in the complex “computerizations” of vehicular electronics can be hidden. As much as more details are available there are also more complex systems which can hide other details.

The view of many is that police should be allowed the time to complete an investigation before providing any further comment. But that is not the case. In almost every collision that occurs in the vicinity police never reveal the details of what occurred and why it occurred. This is particularly important when innocent citizens are involved, some of whom are injured or killed, with any closure to family and friends.

Gorski Consulting Sets Up Account On Bluesky

by | Mar 14, 2025 |

This photo was taken on Remembrance Day ceremonies in November, 2019 in the Town of Ingersoll, Ontario, Canada. We Canadians do not walk through bitter conditions with no purpose. We do so because freedom and dignity is not only important to Canadians, but is worthwhile protecting across the globe.

Elon Musk’s X (Twitter) may be the only bully on the block but there are alternatives to those who want to communicate in a world with some sanity. As a protest against the Musk/Trump insanity Gorski Consulting has opened a new account with Bluesky. There may also be other alternatives out there but for now the sky is blue. So come and join us at Bluesky (we have no relationship with them) as we will be posting there while we consider our options of exiting X altogether.

Why Will Vehicle Event Data Recorders (“Black Boxes”) Be Required to Record More Detailed Data by September, 2027?

by | Mar 8, 2025 |

First generation event data recorders (“Black Boxes”) started appearing on 1999 General Motors products such as shown in this view. Although GM eventually increased the recording time up to 8 seconds before impact not much change has been seen in the detail and duration of recording in EDRs for the past 25 years. Now the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration will require manufacturers to increase the detail and duration of these recordings.

Seemingly, the “detailed” data now being collected whenever a motor vehicle crash takes place is enough to provide many experts, and the courts, with an acceptable understanding of how a collision occurred. Yet the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has completed a new ruling, effective January 17, 2025, that will require motor vehicle manufacturers to record data at a much higher detail and over a much longer time. The present requirement is to record at 2 samples every second over a time of 5 seconds. The new requirement will be to record at 10 samples every second over a time of 20 seconds. This requirement must be enabled by most motor vehicle manufacturers by September 1, 2027. Is this additional detail necessary? The average citizen has no idea.

In NHTSA’s discussion of the Final Ruling, they summarized the need as follows:

“The increased sample rate required by this final rule will provide crash investigators a better understanding of the sequence of pre-crash actions, and the increased recording duration will provide more details on actions taken prior to crashes. Specifically, with the implementation of this final rule’s increased recording duration, actions such as running a stop sign or red light could be captured in full and included in crash reconstruction when supplemented with roadway and traffic control information. The increased recorded duration could also help capture any corrective maneuvers taken by a vehicle prior to an initial road departure. The increased data recording frequency required by this final rule will help clarify the interpretation of recorded pre-crash information, including braking and steering actions taken by a vehicle. It will also help reduce potential uncertainty related to the relative timing of recorded data elements, and assist with the identification of potential pedal misapplication.”

In another section of NHTSA’s report they discussed the content of an earlier Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). In the NPRM the following comment was given:

“In support of the proposal, the NPRM explained that in some crash circumstances ( e.g., brake application and release or rapid reversals in steering input of less than 0.5 seconds), 2 Hz may be insufficient to identify crash causation factors, as it is possible for an EDR recording at 2 Hz to miss rapid vehicle control inputs. Thus, although more crash causation information would be captured with the proposed 20 second time duration, this data could be misinterpreted without a refinement and increase in the EDR sampling acquisition frequency.”

So NHTSA is stating that there is a problem.

The requirement for additional detail and duration of recording comes with a cost. NHTSA argues that the cost is not that large as most current hardware is able to meet that requirement without much re-design.

It is worthwhile noting that NHTSA’s requirements as to what manufacturers must record were originally created in 2006, or almost 20 years ago. NHTSA’s position was that, these requirements must exist only if manufacturers chose to install an event data recorder (EDR). In other words manufacturers could refuse to install an EDR as their option, but if an EDR exists it must record a list of 15 required parameters. To this day manufacturers still have the option of not installing an EDR in their vehicles.

Driving in earlier times, without modern safety standards and electronics, was much simpler and much more dangerous. As the dice shown in this photo, if you drove your vehicle the chance that you would survive, sustain injury, or be fatally injured was often a matter of luck.

Trump Tariff Turmoil – An Impetus For Canadian Cycling?

by | Feb 22, 2025 |

Cycling is cheap. It does not require external fuel and it is healthy. In many instances business trips can be made by carrying modest amounts of cargo. All these points indicate that the bazaar tariffs on Canada by its southern neighbor may ultimately lead to some positives by forcing Canadians to become more self-reliant.

Threatened import tariffs by a deranged U.S. president have many Canadians believing its southern neighbour is the new “public enemy #1”. The transportation sector is an example where illogical tariffs could create turmoil on both sides of the border as some car manufacturing and parts plants may close and costs of motor vehicles may rise. If there is a silver lining in all this mayhem it is that cycling in Canada may get a boost.

Cycling is a non-technical mode of transportation that does not require expensive or complicated parts shipped across Canada’s border. Many things get done under the radar by the community of cyclists who are often invisible to the public eye. Yes there are the impressive-looking cargo bikes that could be useful in some circumstances. However a lot of work is done on simple bikes with no fancy design.

Cycles specifically designed to carry cargo are infrequently observed in the City of London. This may be due to their cost. Certainly they are able to carry significant cargo and, when accompanied by an electric motor, they can be far cheaper to operate than a gas-powered motor vehicle.

In remains a fact that small-scale business activities of Canadian society are often overlooked and never fully documented. This is because so much of it remains unofficial. Within the activities of cyclists there are numerous instances where business acts are completed without recognition of their importance. Yet there are a vast number of them.

This article will examine some recent observations of cyclists in London, Ontario taken from a broader study undertaken by Gorski Consulting over many years. The focus will be on the types of cyclists that are observed conducting non-official business activities, from very low-cost activities, to those that require greater expenditures to achieve their work. This will emphasize that cycling for business can be a viable option when dictatorial insanity to the south attempts to disrupt Canadian society. But this cycling activity needs government intervention to make it more organized and efficient. It also needs government involvement to provide public disclosure about how cyclist injuries and deaths are occurring so that corrections can be made and cycling can be a true benefit to Canadian society.

Low-End Cyclist Business Activities

Those at the lower end of the economical scale have developed unique ways to transport cargo and conduct personal business. At the cheapest end of the scale are those who carry cargo without any attachments to a cycle. Some of these instances have been observed on London’s streets recently and are shown below.

The person on the right shows how various carts and wagons are used by pedestrians to transport cargo. The cycle rider on the left shows how bulky cargo is transported in precarious ways throughout the City. In both instances these modes of transportation are extremely cheap and far more common than officially recognized.
Here minor cargo is transported on the cycle’s handlebar while the cyclist is also holding a coffee cup. The cyclist is also not wearing a helmet. Safety is compromised but this type of transportation is observed on a constant basis in the City.
For those murderers who must dismember bodies this view shows that the transportation of a chainsaw can be done on a cycle. Oh, and holding a cup of coffee, by the same hand, can be done at the same time.
Here a cyclist who has too much cargo resting on his handlebars simply steers by holding onto the cargo. Again, while such actions are not condoned, they exist and this is reality.
Even smaller pieces of cargo can become dangerous as shown here where the red scarf is hanging precariously in the spokes of the cycle’s front wheel.
Not every cyclist is capable of carrying cargo with the same level of ease. As shown here elderly riders may have difficulties when too much cargo weighs onto the handlebar. Yet, when necessity calls for it, such transportation is done, regardless of age.
Here we see another typical male cyclist with no helmet but riding with substantial number of bags hanging from the handlebars. This is done while higher speed motor vehicle traffic is nearby.
In younger years almost every cyclist has been a “taxi” to a friend. While many of these travels involved a passenger sitting on the top-tube those tubes do not exist on many newer cycles and they are no longer horizontal. In the modern age this passenger rides with his feet on the back axle. Still cheaper than Uber.
Here a larger table seems to be no problem for transportation on a cycle without any additional equipment. Yet in the narrowed environment of a protected cycling lane such an activity could be hazardous or incapable of occurring.
This may be an example of a cycling waiter or bartender. A tray filled with coffee cups is being delivered by cycle to persons unknown.

These are just a few of the many examples observed around the City of London where unofficial business is being conducted on a cycle without any specific designs or attachments. There are instances where cargo carrying on a cycle involves additional attachments and some observed examples of this are shown below.

Personal Business Cycling With Additional Attachments

Official “pannier” saddlebags are common in transporting limited amounts of cargo on cycles but that attachment involves a cost which, even though moderate, is not accepted by those with very limited incomes or no income at all.
The pushing of grocery carts while riding a cycle is a common activity in London that is not even discussed. While these carts can carry a substantial cargo they also can be difficult to manuveur while also attempting to steer the cycle on or across an urban roadway.
Given the lack of official recognition, a number of views of cyclists pushing grocery carts will be shown in this article because of the importance of this issue. This activity is common yet it is also unsafe. In this view the cyclist is also not wearing a helmet so any collision event could cause a needless increase in injury.
Here we see a cyclist who has stepped off his cycle and is walking on a sidewalk while also pushing a grocery cart. In a short distance this rider will mount his cycle. Again, no helmet is worn here.
In another example here we see a male cyclist with no helmet pushing a grocery cart but he rides on the sidewalk. This is safer for the cyclist but may not be safe for any pedestrians if care is not taken.
And here we see a somewhat uncommon situation where a cycle is being carried on top of a loaded grocery cart. It needs to be acknowledged that, although this seems unusual it is also not unique. Actions like these are occurring in the City of London.
This view shows a common situation where baggage is attached in various ways to a carrier on a cycle. Again, various methods are employed to enable the carrying of cargo through various attachments.
Here we see a situation where the cyclist has decided to dismount while pulling a loaded wagon. This is not always the case. In many instances cyclists will ride while pulling such wagons.
Here we see an entrepreneurial cyclist who has attached a large garbage bin to the back of his cycle. While uncommon a variety of such attachments are used by cyclists to complete some form of business.
Pushing grocery carts while riding a cycle is common in London. But the additional width of the cycle and cart lead to problems when attempting to fit within the limited confides of a painted cycling lane. Here we see that the cyclist is already at the extreme edge of the cycling lane but then he encounters an obstacle which causes a greater problem, as shown in the next photo.
A garbage can has been discarded into the cycling lane causing a cyclist to travel outside of the cycling lane and into the lane designated for motor vehicle traffic. Such complications are not officially acknowledged and dangerous scenarios like these persist without public recognition.
In this photo we see an extreme reliance on multiple cargo-baring carts while a cyclist walks his cycle in an urban area of London. These unique solutions are helpful in accomplishing a business need but also creating potential safety problems.

Having reviewed some unique cycling combinations there is one which, in our view, is most promising and it has been left for this last discussion. Cycles with mini-trailer attachments at the back of the cycle are the best solution because they can carry substantial cargo, are narrow enough to fit within the confines of typical cycling lanes and they are also the safest combinations of all. The photos below provide some examples of cycles and mini-trailers observed in London.

This photo provides a typical scenario where a cyclist has attached a mini-trailer to the back of his cycle. Even though the rider is not wearing a helmet the mini-trailer provides him with greater stability. Also any cargo in the trailer is positioned at a low level and this also improves stability. If the cyclist was carrying cargo above his wheel for example this could create an unstable situation even with moderate steering inputs.
In this example a female rider is transporting a child in a mini-trailer attached to the rear of the cycle. Again this does not reduce the stability of cycle. However it is not the safest situation for the child which might not be visible to drivers of motor vehicles.
In this example a cyclist has modified the mini-trailer by removing its sides thus allowing to carry cargo of larger dimensions. Even so this combination would fit within the confines of a typical cycling lane.
Here is another example where the sides of a mini-trailer have been removed thus allowing for the transport of a wider range of cargo.

Cycling Insecurity Due To Theft

While unofficial business activities take place in the City of London, there are hazards that remain and need greater government intervention. One of the greatest problems for cyclists is theft. Whenever a cycle is left in a public, or even private space, it is vulnerable to being stolen. Some examples of observations are shown below.

While this view does not show any additional attachment, it shows that other cycles are transported, possibly for dubious reasons, by simply steering them in a riderless fashion. Unfortunately stealing cycles in not that difficult to do but it is a business in which some persons excel.
As a demonstration that possible cycle theft is not uncommon, here is another rider who is pushing an unoccupied cycle for unexplained reasons.
And again, here we have another unoccupied cycle that is being transported for suspicious reasons.

Cycling has the potential of being a great benefit to Canadian society but headwinds like theft exist that prevent it from being what it could be. This mode of transportation is fragile. It requires public attention and action to expand its benefits.

Discussion

These photos have shown unorthodox ways in which cyclists in London carry cargo to achieve unofficial business. Each rider and their circumstance is unique. Because of these homemade alterations the efficiency of them is mixed while the threat to their safety is real. Mini-trailers attached to the rear of cycles provide the best combination, both in terms of cargo carrying capability but also in terms of cycling safety. Governments could improve these conditions by making mini-trailers more available especially to those a the bottom of the income bracket. Many cyclists use their cycles as an essential mode of transportation because they cannot afford other alternatives and they tend to develop home-made improvisations due to necessity. These improvisations may solve their initial problems but they add to the likelihood that a collision will occur either with motor vehicle traffic or via single-cycle loss-of-control. Yet carrying cargo and conducting business in these inexpensive ways can provide Canadians with independence from foreign agencies that would wish to destabilize the Canadian economy.

Access to Vehicle Infotainment and Camera Data Complicates Court Evidence and Owner Rights

by | Feb 9, 2025 |

A page taken from a typical, modern, vehicle owners manual shows just some of the numerous options available. Those complicated options come with a wide variety of data stored throughout a vehicle’s complex electronic system of modules and software. While this data should be available to a vehicle owner in reality it is not.

The technology existing in newer motor vehicles is quickly becoming more complex while causing questions to be asked about ethics and vehicle owner rights. Data from Event Data Recorders (“Black Boxes”) have been available to download from vehicles as early as 1999 (GM products). As technology has evolved so have the complications of what kind of data is captured, who can retrieve it and how this affects the rights of vehicle owners involved in collisions who should be able to use that data in their defense.

The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration set out rules to be followed by vehicle manufacturers as to what kind of data those manufacturers were required to capture and how that data was to be made available to vehicle owners. That law was to become effective with 2013 model vehicles. The success of that rule was marginal. Although most manufacturers complied with that ruling in terms of capturing the required parameters, the availability of that data has fallen short. Many manufacturers have allowed their vehicles to be compatible with crash data retrieval hardware which has been purchased by almost all police forces, insurers and research institutes, However a number of manufacturers have opted out and created their own hardware. All this hardware is expensive and requires trained personnel to conduct a download which adds more cost to the activity. The bottom line is that the average owner/consumer is in no position to obtain the data from their own vehicle. Yet police can access the data for criminal matters and insurers can access it by requiring the owner to surrender their rights of defense to the insurer. And large research institutions can assess it for “benign” purposes.

In recent years matters have become even more complicated. Vehicles no longer have a single EDR module, but the complete vehicle electronics system is a complex of integrated modules that store a variety of data in a variety of locations. Now vehicle infotainment systems can be interrogated by specialized software (Berla) and many vehicles are now equipped with multiple cameras whose views can also be downloaded by specialized equipment.

As an example, Nissan is offering owners the option to purchase an app which will allow them to download camera data on select 2024 and 2025 vehicles. Some details of the plan are discussed on the Nissan website but the cost is not revealed.

It remains questionable how these complications will apply in court proceedings where a vehicle owner ought to have the right to examine evidence in their own defense. If hardware, software and technician costs are too high does that take away the owner’s right to the evidence? What happens if police do not download all the available data in a criminal case because there could be significant costs associated with that? Will this be a matter of “evidence spoilation” that have been a point of argument in historic criminal cases?

Unfortunately the laws are slow to react to quickly developing technologies and vehicle owners may suffer these consequences for many years before the “wild west” is brought to order. Or it may never be brought to order.

Archives

Recent Posts