Doug Ford Government Teaching Ontario How To Cycle Backwards

Politics is creating a greater rift between cyclists and motor vehicle drivers as the Doug Ford government in the Canadian Province of Ontario is threatening to remove previously installed cycling lanes because their installation by local governments has “gone out of control”. Politicizing such issues as cycling safety is a continued demonstration that some governments will use whatever means are available to attempt to stay in power, even if it means throwing flames on a conflict that jeopardizes public safety.
The creation of cycling lanes should not be an emotional issue but it has become so. Opponents on both sides ought to be looking at good-quality, objective data to understand where their opinions should reside.
At Gorski Consulting we believe and understand that active transportation, including cycling, along with mass public transit, are extremely important to nullify the real effects of climate change. Changes in how we move must be made and these changes need to be made in a way that creates the least conflict, including targeted education that informs why change is needed. Regrettably, the government of Doug Ford is a negative influence in these essential changes.
Ontario Continues To Mis-Report Numbers of Fires in Motor Vehicle Collisions

The latest version of the Ontario Road Safety Annual Report (ORSAR) in from 2021 and this is reports collision data that is almost 4 years old. Yet it is the only document that can hold the Government of Ontario accountable for its road safety actions. When new developments arise that affect the public’s safety government data cannot be reliable when it is reporting old data. The issue of vehicle fires is one that is becoming more important and this demonstrates how the Government of Ontario is not properly informing the public able this growing incidence.
Background
Looking back at previous publications of the ORSAR we can see how the government has reported the numbers of vehicle fires as shown in the table below.

We have previously reported that the actual incidence of vehicle fires is higher as demonstrated by the small sample of fire articles that we are able to track from news media reports. That data is shown below.

The graphic shown above is likely a large under-estimate of the actual numbers of vehicle fires occurring because we have limited resources in keeping track of these incidents. The large jump in reports of vehicle fires that is shown after 2015 is likely because we started to become more diligent in tracking news media reports of fires. Yet comparing what is shown in the ORSAR there is an obvious under-reporting of collision fires, even though the news media data are themselves under-estimates of the true incidence.
Data from the latest ORSAR (2021) is shown in the two figures below.


Once again it can be seen that the ORSAR contains a category for “Fire/Explosion” and here we see that there was only one incident of a death, one incident of a personal injury, and 61 incidents of property damage.
Indisputable evidence contradicts what is reported in the ORSAR.
Examples of Fatal and Critical Injury Collisions Involving Collision Fires
As an example, on August 13, 2021 a driver was killed when his vehicle rear-ended a stopped, disabled transport truck on Hwy 401 near Keele Street. The only official announcement was that the vehicle caught fire and the driver died.
Another fatal collision occurred on August 7, 2021 on Blyth Road west of Goderich, Ontario. a single vehicle struck a tree and caught fire. The vehicle was “fully engulfed” by fire.
In another example, a collision occurred at an undisclosed location on a Perth Road near Milverton. New media reported that a person had died at the scene but neither police nor news media reported that a fire had taken place. The only indication of the fire was that a photo was provided by a passerby and included in the news report – That photo showed heavy smoke engulfing a vehicle.
In another example, a fatal collision occurred on June 24, 2021 where a vehicle rear-ended a transport truck on Hwy 400 near the Finch Ave exit. Paramedics indicated that a person was pronounced dead at the scene and police reported that “one” of the vehicles had caught fire.
In another example, a collision occurred on June 17, 2021 near Uxbridge Concession Rod 6 and Ashworth Road. It was reported that a pick-up truck rear-ended a stopped dump truck and the pick-up caught fire. The driver of the pick-up truck was killed.
In another example. an incident occurred on May 8, 2021 on Burnhamthorpe Road and Promontory Crescent in Mississauga, where initial reports did not indicate that a collision occurred, only that a single vehicle travelled off the roadway and caught fire. Subsequently it was reported that a Ferrari sports car had struck a lamp standard and there were reports by witnesses of very large “fireball”. Two persons in the vehicle were reportedly killed.
In another example, police arrived near Howden and Harmony Roads in Oshawa on October 24, 2021 where they located a 2021 Honda Civic that had struck a tree and was engulfed in flames. The lone driver was pronounced dead at the scene.
In another example, on July 7, 2021 a vehicle rolled over and burst into flames outside the Kia car dealership on the Queensway in Toronto. A last report one occupant of the vehicle was in critical condition.
In another example, on January 1, 2021, three vehicles were involved in a collision at the intersection of Wilson Ave and Keels Street in Toronto. One of the vehicles rolled over and caught fire. Officials reported that one person sustained critical injuries but it was not revealed which vehicle that occupant came from.
In another example, on June 29, 2021, police discovered a burning vehicle on the outskirts of Sudbury and they discovered a body in the vehicle. Minimal information was made available with respect to what kind of incident was involved.
In another example, on August 11, 2021, a two-vehicle collision occurred at the intersection of Wonderland Road and Glanworth Drive in South London. One of the vehicles caught fire and an occupant was reported to have sustained fatal injuries. A second occupant sustained life-threatening injuries.
In another example, on December 21, 2021, vehicle struck a backhoe at a construction site on Dundonald Road in Glencoe Ontario. The vehicle then burst into flames and the driver was reportedly killed.
Summary
In summary these are 12 examples where 10 fatalities occurred and 2 persons sustained life-threatening injuries. This evidence is indisputable that fatalities and fires exist that are not being reported in official Ontario statistics such as the ORSAR . In a number of these incidents officials appeared to be lax about confirming whether the fatalities were related to the fires. And this is typical of what is taking place whenever a collision fire is involved. Behind this small list of fatal collisions there is a very large number of injury collisions where fires are involved but are not being reported. And there are even a much larger number of incidents where vehicle fires are not reported because injuries were either minor did not occur.
All this information is based on 4-year-old data because the Province of Ontario has not provided any newer statistics about what is happening now. And that should raise an alarm.
Motor Vehicle Speed Detection in London Ontario Canada

Background
Documenting of motor vehicle speeds has become an increasing activity on roadways throughout the world. This has been possible as technology has allowed for for more sophisticated methods. As vehicles become more connected to the roadway infrastructure, and to themselves, accurate and precise speed data will become more pervasive. In the vicinity of London, Ontario, Canada those future connections are still forthcoming, however various forms of traffic surveillance exist. More permanent speed cameras have been authorized by local authorities, primarily at important intersections. However portable traffic monitoring units have also begun to be used at an increasing rate. The City of London has begun posting portable “Scout” traffic monitoring units in designated communities as shown in the example below.

As officials have concluded that typical speeding controls by the physical presence of police are expensive, a variety of infrastructure changes have been introduced. Speed bumps, or humps, are a way making it more difficult for the average driver to pass over them at higher speeds and therefore it is believed that this can be a successful method of controlling speed and increasing safety. Various methods of narrowing streets or placing obstacles within the traffic lane are also consistent with the belief that, making it more challenging to pass through them will reduce speeds and increase safety. The success of these changes has never included a detailed documentation of what damage they cause to motor vehicles that pass over or through them and to what degree single vehicle collisions are increased through contacting these structures or by drivers attempting to avoid them. As most such instances result in relatively minor damage they do not make it to official statistics.
Another option has involved the use of Speed Display Boards (SDBs) that display the speed of an approaching vehicle in the hope that this will reduce the driver’s speed. Gorski Consulting has conducted several observational documentations of SDBs in the past with mixed results. A new opportunity revealed itself when, on October 4, 2024, the City of London set up four SDBs on Hale Street in east London, Ontario. This allowed Gorski Consulting to attend at one of the SDBs to document the speeds that the SDB displayed. This also allowed for an assessment of the functioning of the SDB.
Description of the Current Speed Display Board (SDB) Study
In our recent studies on Hale Street two-hour video sessions were completed on four dates:
October 4,2024 between 2100 & 2300 hours
October 5, 2024 between 0600 & 0800 hours
October 5, 2024 between 1600 & 1800 hours
October 5, 2024 between 2050 & 2250 hours
These sessions documented northbound vehicles in the distance from the north end of the roundabout of Hale, through to the location of the SDB, just past the north end of the property at 361 Hale Street, as shown in the graphic below.



For this present article only the data from the last session, October 5, 2024 between 2050 and 2250 hours, will be reviewed.
Throughout the present study the SDB was noted to function erratically. Its display would become confused when there was more than one vehicle within the 180-metre detection zone. At times the SDB would continue displaying a speed for several seconds after the last vehicle already exited the detection zone. At other times the SDB failed to detect the presence of a vehicle even when there was no interference and there was only a single vehicle approaching through the detection zone.
However It is believed, based on previous experience, that these detection failures do not carry over into providing inaccurate displays of actual approach speed of the vehicles that have been detected. On several occasions the speed displayed by a SDB has been compared to the speed calculated from our multi-vehicle camera procedures and it has been found that the two methods come to substantial agreement with respect to the actual speed of vehicles.
Results From Current Traffic Study
A review of the speed data showed that, in the two-hour session from 2050 to 2250 hours , a total of 87 observations of northbound vehicles were documented. There were actually many more northbound vehicles present however, due to the known problems that the SDB had with reliable detection, documentation was made only in those occasions where a single vehicle was present within the detection zone. This was done to be certain that the displayed speed data was not contaminated by confusion of the SDB when more than one vehicle was present in the detection zone. Thus there were a number of occasions where a line of several northbound vehicles passed through the site but they could not be documented because it was known that the SDB would not be able to distinguish between the speed of each vehicle in the detection zone.
The speed data that was collected included the speed indicated by the SDB when the vehicle first became detected. At night-time it was observed that the SDB could first detect vehicles at a distance of about 180 metres. In daytime hours this distance was much shorter. While it cannot be known for certain it is believed that during nighttime the contrast between the headlights of approaching vehicles and the dark surroundings made it easier for the SDB to detect a vehicle.
A second speed was documented which was the highest speed detected during the time that the SDB was displaying the approaching vehicle’s speed. In a very large percentage of times the speed at first detection was also the highest speed that as detected.
A third speed was documented which was the final speed displayed on the SDB as the approaching vehicle exited the detection zone.
The posted maximum speed in this zone of detection was 40 km/h. It was found that the average speed of northbound vehicles at initial detection was 52.72 km/h. The average maximum speed detected during the full travel distance was 54.02 km/h. And the average speed when the vehicles exited the detection zone was 43.21 km/h.
The conclusion drawn from this study is that drivers were travelling substantially faster than the posted maximum speed when they entered the detection zone. Some of those drivers travelled even faster as they passed through the detection zone. However the data shows that the average driver responded well to observing the speed shown on the SDB and average speeds were reduced to just above the posted maximum speed by the time that vehicle exited the detection zone. However not all the news was good.
Thirteen of the 87 northbound vehicles were observed to be travelling above 60 km/h or over 20 km/h above the posted speed limit. Thus about 15 per cent of drivers were driving at 20 km/h or faster than the posted speed limit. This is fairly consistent with results obtained by Gorski Consulting from other sites in past studies. However, of the 87 documented vehicles, not a single vehicle was ever observed to pass through the detection zone at a maximum speed of 40 km/h or lower. Thus it could be argued that 100 per cent of the documented vehicles were “speeding”.
However, at the end of the detection zone 23 of the 87, or 26 per cent, vehicles were observed to be travelling at 40 km/h or less. This may indicate a temporary success or it may also have some longer lasting effects that would need further study.
Other Speed Studies At Site
Previously Gorski Consulting had conducted several, multi-video camera studies on Hale Street. Several sessions were conducted in June, 2021 when Hale Street was still signed with a 50 km/h maximum speed. In these sessions the purpose was to document traffic (motor vehicle and cyclist) and pedestrian volume. Thus speeds were not calculated.
The Maximum Posted Speed on Hale Street was reduced to 40 km/h on approximately September 1, 2022. Before this change took place two speed studies were conducted by Gorski Consulting in May of 2022 at the same site of Hale Street where the current SDB analysis was conducted. On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 synchronized, multiple video cameras were set up and speeds were documented over a one-hour period. In that study only non-interfered vehicles were documented. Both northbound and southbound vehicles were documented, commencing at 1335 hours. The results showed that, over the one-hour period, 226 southbound vehicles were documented and their average speed was 57.67 km/h. Ninety-one of these 226 vehicles were observed to be travelling at 60 km/h or more. This percentage is just over 40 per cent. In contrast 245 northbound vehicles were documented and their average speed was 51.56 km/h. Only 17 of those 245 vehicles were observed to be travelling at 60 km/h or higher, or about 6.9 per cent. Thus on this afternoon the average speed of southbound vehicles was much higher than northbound vehicles.
In the second study, on May 21, 2022, vehicle speed documentation was commenced at 1825 hours for one hour. Of the 199 southbound vehicles their average speed was 54.69 km/h. Forty-two of those southbound vehicles were observed to be travelling at or above 60 km/h, or 21.1 per cent. For northbound vehicles 205 were documented with an average speed of 53.51 km/h and 38 of those vehicles travelled at or above 60 km/h, or 18.5 per cent. Thus during these session conducted during the evening the average speeds of northbound and southbound vehicles was similar.
Additional data was also obtained on two other dates but this data has not be analysed up to this time. Thus a speed study was conducted on May 12, 2022 when the posted speed limit was 50 km/h, and another was performed on May 26, 2023 after the posted speed limit was reduced to 40 km/h. Because speed analysis is so time consuming we have not found time to review this data, although this may be done sometime in the future.
Summary
It has been suggested by many that road safety can be improved by posting a reduced maximum speed. Studies by Gorski Consulting suggest this belief is not supported by our traffic data. On Hale Street vehicles were observed to travel substantially above the speed limit of 50 km/h however the speeds varied in terms of time of day and direction of travel. Once the speed limit was reduced to 40 km/h the SDB data showed that, when first detected, motor vehicles continued travel at about the same speed in the new 40 km/h zone as they did when the area was a 50 km/h zone. As the SDB data showed that not a single documented vehicle travelled at or below the 40 km/h speed limit one could argue that 100 per cent of drivers were “speeding” when they were first detected. Yet the SDB data also showed that the vast majority of drivers reduced their speed as they passed through the detection zone. This success may be temporary, or it may have longer lasting benefits. Conclusions can be made if further traffic studies are performed.
The Political Destruction of Dundas Street and Downtown London Ontario
Governments that force changes in transportation efficiency and safety often fail to understand that they ought to help those whose existence is threatened by those changes. While official plans glorify the benefits of the changes they rarely discuss what elements of society will be destroyed. In the medium-sized City of London, Ontario, Canada the results of government interventions, or lack there of, have led to the destruction of many small and independent businesses along its main street, Dundas Street. Along with other political decisions that also targeted persons of low income this has led to areas of depressed economic activity that has not been seen before.
Background
Looking back, the main street of London, Ontario, Dundas Street, was a vibrant area of economic activity for well over 100 years. Dundas Street in downtown London was where you wanted to be. An example of this is the historic photo of the area below, from the year 1956.

Dundas Street in downtown London was beginning to falter even as early as the 1980s. It was then that politicians agreed to have a new mall built to help boost the area. Galleria Mall saw its opening day in 1989. It is shown on the left of the photo below, taken in 2013. While there were great expectations that Galleria Mall would revive downtown Dundas, the opposite occurred. The exterior or the mall appeared to be closed to its surroundings as there were no street-side windows and there was no connection with existing, local merchants.

Political decisions caused changes to London as well as to the Province of Ontario leading to a progressive attack on cities such as London and specifically Dundas Street. The Tory provincial government of Mike Harris was brought into power in 1995. Its legacy is encapsulated by a single sentence written in a 2023 article by John Ibbitson:
“The government closed and amalgamated dozens of hospitals, cut welfare benefits by more than 20 per cent and slashed the number of school boards by almost half.”
The Harris government also introduced the Municipal Act which off-loaded many costs, such as roadway responsibilities, to local governments. Also, the monitoring of roadway safety issues, that used to be conducted in uniform manner by the province, province-wide, was now left to local municipalities. This led to the creation of non-uniform roadway control, planning and implementation.
The “common sense” of closing many mental hospitals meant that those persons with cognitive challenges were sent onto the street, essentially to fend for themselves. This had disastrous effects on communities and Dundas Street in particular. Dundas Street in East London had already been feeling the effects of previous political disasters in the late 1960s and 1970s such as the rebuilding of Dundas Street into a a river-like, curving road that took away parking and thus took away customers from East London businesses. The city mayor at the time owned a construction company that was hired to install expensive brickwork along Dundas between Elizabeth Street and Adelaide Street. This brickwork started to fall apart and was expensive to repair. That whole area of Dundas Street was reconstructed again to its original, straight form, with some parking, but the damage had already been done to local, independent businesses. The main businesses such as Hudsons, London Furniture, Metropolitan and the Brass Rail Tavern all began to leave the area with nothing to replace them. Those displaced persons from mental hospitals and those who had their social benefits removed by the Harris government began to enter onto the sidewalks of Dundas east. But Dundas in the downtown area was still saved from that prospect for several more decades.
For decades the most commercial “place to be” had always been the intersection of Dundas Street and Richmond Street. This is where the very successful Ingram & Smallman department store expanded to the very successful Simpsons department store. Bus Simpsons began to falter and was bought out by The Bay. This change lasted successfully for a few more years before The Bay moved out of the Dundas-Richmond intersection and the depression of the area began to intensify.

Historical photos of downtown Dundas Street show that there was many beautiful buildings that existed here but these were torn down. Without such buildings it made it more difficult to attract customers to the area when there was nothing beautiful to see. An example of some beautiful architecture is shown in the historical photo below, taken on Dundas Street from just west of the Simpsons store, reportedly in 1951.

As mentioned earlier the political disaster of the Galleria Mall began to take its effect on downtown Dundas Street. Essentially no business could survive inside the mall and they soon departed leaving an empty shell. The mall was re-named the Citi Plaza but the name change made no difference. From every direction the exterior walls of the mall contained no windows and no connection with the local businesses located next to it.
Signs of economic problems on Dundas Street were not easily recognized. The development of the John Labatt Centre (JLC) was a great success to downtown London. This arena holding approximately 10,000 persons saw many new musical and sports events. With the re-development of the Covent Garden Market next to it there was a sense that downtown was headed toward some good times. But the backside (north side) of the JLC faced Dundas Street and, just like the Galleria Mall, its walls contained no windows and no connection to the outside street. Also, with the building of the formidable London Court House, and the Bell building, the trio of these buildings made it unpleasant to walk in the area of Dundas Street between Ridout and Talbot, as shown in the 2017 photo below.

The rise of Big Box businesses such as Costco, and on-line shopping establishments such as Amazon, placed further pressure on the small businesses lining the downtown of Dundas Street, and these businesses continued to falter.
Meanwhile to the east, the Dundas Street community in East London had been in complete shambles for many years. The successful business area of Dundas Street near English Street became destroyed as the complete block of buildings on the north side of Dundas were leveled, as shown in the 2013 photo below.

With the hot real estate markets of nearby cities like Toronto, home rental costs went up and the building of affordable housing was low. This sent more persons onto Dundas Street East with no where to go. Normal businesses could not survive and new ones such as cash lending and pawn shops emerged.

Intensified Road Reconstruction in Downtown London Commencing in 2018
In the midst of the economical woes politicians continued to make roadway “improvements” which shut down parts of Dundas Street. A decision was made to close Dundas east of Egerton for roadway improvements. But this area was shut down and dug up again only a few years later to make room for the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system.

Meanwhile, as time passed, politicians came to the realization that the world’s climate was changing and drastic measures were needed to stop our burning of fossil fuels. This led to the recognition that transportation systems needed to be changed. Transportation needed to involve multi-passenger buses that used electric power rather than gasoline or diesel. And it became essential to cause more transportation via bicycling or by walking. In London this became the impetus for a rapid increase in the number of cycling lanes throughout the City. It also became the impetus for creating a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system through select, high-volume roads.
For Dundas Street in London these political decisions led to many years of traffic chaos which began in 2018 with the decision to create “Dundas Place” between Ridout and Wellington Rd. But this was also an area where many small businesses were attempting to survive harsh economic times.

Dundas Street became closed to all traffic from the spring of 2018 to the fall of 2019 for the creation of Dundas Place. As shown in the photos below, this was a dramatic stoppage of economic activity that greatly affected local, independent businesses.




As if the hardships of Dundas Place were not enough, a pandemic struck the world in late 2019 with the introduction of Covid 19. Persons could not interact in public and were required to wear masks. This created severe hardships for businesses throughout Canada but those hardships were increased along downtown Dundas Street where essentially no shopping was possible.
In the spring of 2020 the completion of Dundas Place could be examined and the logic of the costs to create it could be assessed. It was noted that a complicated brickwork of a winding “river” in the road surface was developed as if this would be the saving characteristic of the revitalization. This was reminiscent of the meandering “river” that was created on Dundas Street in East London in the late 1960s and 1970s which was instrumental in accelerating the depression of that neighbourhood.

Even though Covid-19 and the traffic problems of Dundas Place were creating havoc in downtown London, politicians embarked on other transportation “improvements” which worsened these problems. As an example, Richmond Street was closed from York to King Street for restoration, as shown in the photo below.

A seemingly yearly shut down of King Street for various road construction also continued through 2020, as shown in the photo below.

Meanwhile city politicians also allowed for lane restrictions on Dundas east of Dundas Place. The area of Dundas east of Wellington Road was restricted to traffic as a new cycling track was being constructed eastward from downtown, as shown below.

By the spring of 2021 city politicians once again decided to make road “improvements” at the west end of Dundas Street by commencing construction at Dundas and Ridout, as shown in the photo below.


City politicians also experimented with closing Dundas Place to traffic at the Talbot, Richmond, and Clarence intersections. The results shown in the next photos are that Dundas Place looked more like a ghost town rather than the vibrant place it had been for decades.



In the fall of 2021 photos showed that King Street was closed once again as work was being done on Richmond Street and the latest construction of the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) was being completed between Ridout and Wellington Road. Photos from that time are show below.



As shown in the photo below King Street still remained closed to traffic on December 1, 2021.

In the spring of 2022 several road closures and restrictions were noted. Queens Ave began be restricted to traffic west of Richmond Street. This also prevented traffic on Queens Ave from entering onto Ridout Street.

Queens Ave then began to be completely closed to traffic at Richmond Street as noted in photo below taken on June 17, 2022.

Wellington Road also became restricted from continued construction on King Street, as shown in the photo below.

Southbound traffic on Talbot Street was also restricted in the spring of 2022 between Dufferin and Queens Ave as the new Centro high-rise building continued to be constructed.

Photos also show that Ridout Street became closed south of Horton Street as the new Victoria Bridge began to be constructed. A photo that is shown below.

The beginning of the year 2023 continued to show that roadway construction was continuing to cause chaos on Dundas Street and downtown London. The construction along King Street was still not completed and this caused lane restrictions on Wellington Road between King and Dundas, as shown in the photos below.


Photos taken on March 24, 2023 show that Ridout Street became closed as work was under way on building the new Victoria Bridge south of Horton Street.

Also reconstruction was taking place along Wellington Road at the south end of downtown resulting in further chaos at intersections such as Horton Street, as shown in the March 30, 2023 photo below.

Lane closures along Horton Street meant that there were long lines of waiting traffic as shown in the photo below from April 3, 2023.

The chaos on Horton Street could be appreciated when looking along Wellington Road on its approach to Horton. Wellington Road was being reconstructed on its approach to downtown London as shown in the photos below taken in the spring of 2023.



In downtown London itself traffic chaos was still occurring on Wellington Road between King Street and York Street as shown in the photo below, looking south along Wellington, taken on September 26, 2023.

The start of the year in 2024 showed that the traffic chaos along Wellington Road intensified. Major reconstruction was now taking place further north, past Dundas Street and toward Queens Ave through the spring of 2024, as shown in the photos below.



At Ridout Street the Victoria Bridge construction was taking shape and some sidewalk access was created along the new bridge as shown in the photo below.

A new element of traffic chaos commenced in the spring of 2024 when the City of London decided to perform major road reconstruction of York Street which closed the road west of Wellington Road. This was at a time when major construction was also taking place along Wellington Road.


By July, 2024 the newly constructed Victoria Bridge was being prepared for opening, as shown in the photo below.

By August 1, 2024 traffic on York Street was still severely limited as shown in the photo below.

Photos taken on September 18, 2024 showed that York Street became fully closed at Clarence Street. Signs of that closure could be seen from the intersection of York and Richmond as shown in the photo below.

By September 30, 2024 photos taken in downtown London showed that Wellington Road still remained restricted from Horton Street through to Dufferin Street, as shown in the photos below.


Throughout these detailed descriptions of road construction in downtown London between 2018 and 2024 there was a demonstration that, although improvements were being made, the improvements also negatively affected the area and particularly Dundas Street. While construction of Dundas Place was completed by 2019, many additional road construction projects commenced which either blocked access to Dundas Street or political decisions were made to close access to it. The combination of these political decisions, along with a lack of recognition that homeless street people were increasingly assembling along downtown Dundas led to extreme difficulties for normal, independent businesses to stay open. Upon completion of this article in October, 2024, these problems continued to exist. While the City of London was becoming larger in population its politicians seemed to conclude that development of large, high-rise buildings would be the mark of a successful city while not seeing the reality that many small businesses were closing and for too many persons on the sidewalks of downtown London were not customers or tourists but the streets became their home, as the cost of housing made it unreachable and they had no where else to go.
Comparison To Other Successful Downtowns
A trip to Great Britain in August and September of 2024 demonstrated how pedestrian malls can be successfully integrated into downtown areas. Britain has a northern climate similar to that of southern Ontario so many of the cold conditions of winter affect both locations. Here are some examples of some successful pedestrian malls in Britain.
The photo below shows Buchanan Street in Glasgow in late August, 2024. It is completely free of motor vehicle traffic yet there are numerous persons walking through the area and many successful, independent shops sell their merchandise to those customers.

Another example of a very successful pedestrian mall is the Royal Mile area in downtown Edenborough Scotland. As shown in the photo below very large numbers of pedestrians walk along this road which is closed to motor vehicle traffic.



A particularly relevant comparison to London’s downtown can be made with Bath England. Bath is a city which is about half the population of London and is located in the county of Summerset, west of London England. While the downtown of London Ontario is struggling the politicians of Bath turned its downtown into a spiderweb of successful pedestrian malls. Much of that success came from Bath officials recognizing that they had interesting and unique, historical buildings that needed preservation. One of the best-known locations in Bath are the roman baths which still stand two thousand years after they were first created.


Extending from the area of the roman baths are a series of pedestrian malls, another example is shown below.

An important element of a successful pedestrian mall is to include unique and independent shops that may sell items of specific relevance to the region. The photo below is an example of merchandise being sold in such an independent shop.

The success of the downtown of London, Ontario must be compared to these other areas where business is thriving. While London’s downtown is expanding in the height and size of its buildings, it is not difficult to detect the decay at its street level. The true measure of success is how the most vulnerable in a community are taken care of, not how the most rich can express their narcistic desires.

In London Ontario we spend much of our time and resources controlling the vulnerable persons we have created and then refuse to make a commitment to make a lasting change.

While this article has expressed some doom and gloom there is also hope and optimism. Much like a brown and dried up lawn on a late summer’s day, the apparent death of a downtown is not forever. A few days of rain, some re-seeding, and careful application of fertilizer can bring back a seemingly dead lawn and the same can occur in downtown London. Despite the folly of many, cities are resilient. In the country my birth, Poland, that resiliency was most evident when 85 per cent of Poland’s capital city was leveled in the 1940s by Nazi aggressors. Warsaw’s historical castle, its main square and the famous King Zygmunt’s monument (my namesake) were completely levelled. But that did not stop the Polish citizens. They gathered photos and drawings of all these destroyed places and reconstructed everything to the point where it is difficult to detect that any of these reconstructions ever took place. This was possible through the resilience, dedication and pride of its citizens. By no means has London Ontario been destroyed to the extent that it cannot be revitalized. It just takes some level-headed thought and wisdom to understand what needs to be done and how to do it.
Volvo Interior Radars to Protect Children & Pets Left Unattended

Technology is expanding to protect the rich. If you can afford to pay about $80,000 US for a new 2025 Volvo EX90 you can be guaranteed that any child or pet left in the interior of your Volvo will be protected by advanced radar sensors. The Detroit Free Press is reporting that Volvo is installing advanced radars that can detect the smallest (just millimeters) movements inside Volvo vehicles and that the vehicle will take action to prevent overheating or hypothermia. When motion is detected the vehicle cannot be locked. The system will turn on the climate control keeping the vehicle at a reasonable temperature until the vehicle’s battery is drained. If potential over-heating is detected the system will unlock the doors and will roll down the windows. It is reported that other manufacturers such as Hyundai and Toyotas will offer less complex systems in some 2025 vehicles.
The Detroit Free Press reported that, since 1998 when records began to be kept, more than 900 children have died in hot vehicles in the U.S. No information is available about how many pets have died.
While this technology may eventually inhabit most vehicles sold in North America will be likely be some time before the average family can be protected for these dreadful outcomes.
You must be logged in to post a comment.