Police Biased Claims That Drivers Responsible For Flying Over Snow-Covered Roadside Barriers

This photo was recently posted by the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) showing snow that has been piled onto a guardrail. In the background is a vehicle that has rolled over top of the rail. Police are using news media to send the biased message that such rollovers are caused by driver error while failing to highlight that the snow covering the barrier is, at least, an equal contributor to the problem.

Police are using official news media in a propaganda scheme to deflect responsibility from municipalities and the Provincial Government of Ontario for failing to properly remove snow that is pushed onto roadside barriers.

Official news media report that at least four cars have flown over barriers of highway in the vicinity of Toronto in the past week. News media then use quotes from police who claim that the reason why these incidents occurred is because of driver error – and nothing to do with the fact that snow was pushed and piled onto roadside barriers, creating a launching pad for any loss-of-control vehicle that is supposed to be protected by the existence of the barriers. News media are used in this occasion as a conduit to publicize the biased reporting by police who are paid by the Province of Ontario and municipalities that are partly responsible for the dangerous safety problems that are created by improper and incomplete snow-plowing operations.

The occurrence of a major snow storm is the blanket used to cover-up the inadequate snow plowing and snow removal. The inability to react to the chaos of such a storm can be understood. But the deflection of responsibility for the chaos by police cannot, and should not be acceptable. Rather than blaming drivers police ought to be asking “When is that snow going be be removed off of that barrier?” It would not require much thought to understand that where these vehicles are being launched is only at the location of a barrier and not along the full length of a highway. And, specifically, there is a greater chance that a vehicle will go out of control on a slippery roadway where there is a horizontal curve. So the magnitude of the problem is not insurmountable: the greatest danger is these specific locations where there is a curve and a barrier. Thus snow plowing does not need to remove snow from every roadside or even from every barrier, but focus needs to be applied at those locations where a curve exists and where this is a greater potential for vehicles to go out of control. Very few drivers understand this distinction. And without being educated on this issue, the police explanation sounds rather plausible.

And this is not a new phenomenon. Safety problems with roadside barriers are a continual problem from various directions, not just from snow-cover and throughout North America. Whenever those safety problems emerge police continually work to deflect responsibility toward drivers and those safety problems are not corrected. Or if they are corrected they are done in secret, on a delayed basis, when the public eye is not watching. And this is not surprising when police are paid by the very entities that they should blame.

Snow Piled On Roadside Barriers Is Dangerous

This photo was posted by the OPP with respect to a collision that occurred on January 30, 2026, on a ramp of the QEW to Highway 420 in Niagara Falls. It shows snow piled onto a guardrail and the vehicle was projected over the rail. Luckily no serious injuries but there this could have been worse.

Two incidents have been reported in the past couple of weeks involving vehicles being projected over roadside barriers because snow had been piled against the barrier. In one instance, photo shown above, the driver was lucky as the vehicle rollover did not proceed down a deep slope, as shown in the next photo.

This second OPP photo shows that the potential danger was due to the large drop from the ramp onto the expressway below. Note the extent of snow that was piled onto the guardrail and made an excellent launching pad for out-of-control vehicles.

In this instance police confirmed that there were “icy roads” and the vehicle “struck the snow on the shoulder” indicating that road maintenance was an issue. Police reported that no charges were laid but the maintenance of the roadway was a factor. Would police not charge the persons involved in maintaining the highway? This is where investigative bias sets in. Even with a major snow storm police have an obligation to inquire why and if certain roadway maintenance was not performed.

In a second incident the situation was more dramatic although the video cannot be shown here. A vehicle was passing through the overpass on Highway 427 at Highway 401 in Toronto on February 3, 2026 when it was launched over a snow-covered barrier and flew onto Highway 401 where it struck the top of a passing tractor-trailer. Miraculously injuries were not life-threatening but obviously a fraction of a second could easily have caused two fatalities in the flying vehicle.

CTV News submitted a photo in their article on a third incident, reportedly on an overpass of Highway 8 in Kitchener on January 26, 2026. The photo clearly showed the extensive snow piled on the barrier of the overpass where the vehicle was launched. In the article on the Highway 427 incident police explained the existence for the snow as follows:

While this is a problem it cannot be left alone, blaming it on winter weather conditions. Like any maintenance issue the question is, was the action reasonable? Could the snow be pushed further off the overpass and then onto a roadside slope? Such actions may be more time consuming and complicated but their reasonableness needs to be evaluated. It is our experience that this is not the first time that barriers have become compromised in this manner, in a number of previous years, throughout the Province of Ontario.

Many transportation complications occur due to winter weather, as they occur in many seasons resulting in various dangers. Snow piled on roadside barriers makes those barriers ineffective and dangerous. So it needs to be removed as quickly as possible.

Extreme Cold Affecting Transportation in Ontario

This scene taken from February 15, 2025 shows how last season the winter was more severe than any since the 1970s in the region of London, Ontario. This year extremely low temperatures have settled in the past week making winter even more extreme than last year. These extremes have an effect on modes of transportation and what kind of vehicles, and persons, can operate in these extremes.

Environment Canada has posted the weather conditions for London, Ontario for the dates of January 29 and 30, 2026 as noted below.

While temperatures between -15 and -21 Celsius are not uncommon in many parts of Canada in winter they are unusual for the most southern areas such as London, Ontario. Wind chills reaching -30 Celsius are rarely seen in London. This weather has been steady over the region for the past week and is likely continue for the next few days.

The effects of weather conditions like these are compounded by news that municipalities in Ontario are running out of road salt. This creates an additional safety problem. Yet the largest salt mine in the world is located just an hour and a half drive north of London at Goderich, Ontario, News media are reporting that long lines of dump trucks are waiting for hours near the Goderich mine to load up on salt.

Without road salt many streets in London are looking like they did many decades ago when road salt was not rigorously applied, as shown in the example below, taken on a local street in London on January 28, 2026.

This is a typical example of snow existing on many local streets in London, Ontario as road salt is not present to melt the snow. Snow plows are also having difficulty reaching all the local streets.

While grand plans have been discussed by many politicians that they are working on increasing the active transportation modes of cycling and walking, the reality in these past two winters in that walking and cycling are extremely difficult when such snow and low temperatures exist.

Bright green painted “cyclist only” zones are very visible when snow does not cover them. However it is difficult to see them in this view. Fortunately very few cyclists ride in these weather conditions.
Sometimes even snow plows get stuck in snow. Here a sidewalk plow is being rescued by a tow truck on Upper Queen near Chiddington on January 27, 2026. Stopped in a live traffic lane the tow truck causes other vehicles to veer into the opposing lane.
Inevitably some drivers loose control of their vehicles and end up in a snow-covered median as was the case here on Highbury Ave. Highbury is particularly hazardous because its old construction contains a lane edge that is too close the shoulder. More modern design creates an extra width of pavement between the white edge line and the gravel. In older times many fatal collisions occurred on major expressways because of this poor design.
Homeless persons find it very difficult to survive in these extreme conditions. They often seek shelter in certain cubby-holes of a downtown such as here on Horton Street west of Wellington Street.
Despite these extreme conditions a few hardy cyclists still venture out. In this example of a rider on Hamilton Road on January 27, 2026, some flattened snow on the sidewalk enables the cyclist to ride, while in most scenarios many riders have to dismount and walk their bike because of the snow.

Overall extreme winter conditions have an affect on road safety. Because of poor traction many drivers are involved in loss-of-control collisions or rear-end impacts. Many of these incidents are minor in severity but some are not. The City of Toronto has seen a rise in the number of pedestrians being injured and killed and these incidents are also likely affected by the weather. Movement in all these extremes is difficult and it relies on everyone to pay particular attention to what they are doing.

Speed Camera Removal Consequences In Ontario

Will the public be told about the consequences of removing speed cameras in Ontario?

Dr. Carrie Mitchell, Associate Professor of Planning at the University of Waterloo is inviting Ontario municipalities to provide their data on how the removal speed cameras (Automated Speed Enforcement – ASE) in Ontario have affected road safety. The title of her research is “After the Cameras: The Policy and Safety Impacts of Removing Automated Speed Enforcement in Ontario“. The announcement reported on the Canadian Association of Road Safety Professionals (CARSP) included the following description:

The result of the research will provide a report of the results to the municipalities. However there has been no mention of whether the results will be provided to the public. In theory municipalities work for the benefit of the public and all employees of these municipalities are funded by public taxes. But when it comes to releasing the results of their studies municipalities are secretive, even when it involves such crucial matters as public safety.

This photo released by the London Fire Department in July, 2025 shows rescue personnel working feverishly to release a pedestrian who had become trapped under a vehicle on Hamilton Road near Rectory Street in London. Costs related to collisions involve the employment of these rescuers but also the heath costs associated with treating the victims. How and why these tragedies occur are rarely or never released to the public who are the victims.

Dubious behaviors of politicians have led to a battleground between governments. Ontario Premier Doug Ford made it unlawful to operate speed cameras in Ontario’s municipalities because he called them “cash grabs”. But no one has publicly explained why this comment was made. Most likely it is because third party companies who operated the cameras on a profit basis were splitting their money with municipalities that allowed them to operate. It is also reasonable to believe that those profits were generated from a lower speeding threshold so that more citizens would be fined. If the camera programs were operated properly the speeding threshold could be increased and thus would capture only those citizens who travel at dangerously high speeds. But then there would be fewer drivers who would be fined and profits would diminished. Is this what Doug Ford was referring to?

But by abolishing speed cameras altogether Ford has made matters worse than they were. Now it may be very difficult to capture speeding drivers when police budgets have not anticipated more police personnel required to monitor and ticket speeding drivers. And, unlike speed cameras, police cannot be present at a location 24-hours-a-day, seven days of the week.

The research announced by Professor Mitchell is important but the results must not be hidden within municipal files and must be released to the public who should have the last say through their voting ballot.

2025 Cyclist Observations Now Available For London Ontario

Cycling trends and safety in London Ontario are the focus of Gorski Consulting studies of cyclists riding on or adjacent to London’s streets. No other photographic data is publicly available.

In the past five years Gorski Consulting has accumulated over 5300 observations of cyclists riding on or adjacent to the streets of London, Ontario. In this past year of 2025 there have been 1434 cyclists documented making it the most in this five-year period. As done in previous years, the charts containing the detailed data are presented below.

The Data

Analysis

Cyclist Gender

Some of the characteristics of cyclists being tracked include gender. This is not always easy because some factors, such as the wearing of headgear, make it difficult to determine gender. However, by removing the small number of observations where gender could not be determined, the following provides a breakdown of cyclist gender in each of the five years.

Year 2021: Total Females = 77, Total Males = 487, Percent Females = 12.54

Year 2022: Total Females = 135, Total Males = 895, Percent Females = 13.11

Year 2023: Total Females = 138, Total Males = 807, Percent Females = 12.54

Year 2024: Total Females = 151, Total Males = 1032, Percent Females = 12.54

Year 2025: Total Females = 186, Total Males = 1204, Percent Females = 13.38

Females are a rare sighting on streets in London Ontario. Unfortunately in this instance the adult female is not wearing a helmet even though the child next to her is wearing one.

These data show that female cyclists consistently average in the range of 13% of the cycling population. This is quite low. Studies in other parts of the City, such as on the Thames Valley Parkway, show that the percentage of female riders is higher.

Riding on Sidewalks

Despite that City and provincial laws prohibit cyclists from riding on sidewalks, this method of travel continues to be a common activity, as demonstrated in the following breakdowns.

Year 2021: Females on Sidewalk = 64.94%, Males on Sidewalk = 64.89%

Year 2022: Females on Sidewalk = 72.59%, Males on Sidewalk = 65.25%

Year 2023: Females on Sidewalk = 65.22%, Males on Sidewalk = 66.79%

Year 2024: Females on Sidewalk = 70.86%, Males on Sidewalk = 62.79%

Year 2025: Females on Sidewalk = 59.68%, Males on Sidewalk = 55.07%

The smaller percentage of cyclists observed on sidewalks is lower in 2025 because there was a change in where the cyclist observations were made. In 2025 there was an increased focus on comparing two roadways: Hamilton-Horton versus Upper Queen-Ridout. The Upper Queen-Ridout roadway contains a cycling lane therefore almost all cyclists riding on this road were riding in the cycling lane and not on the sidewalk. The purpose for comparing these two roadways is because previous data suggested there could be a difference in the characteristics and safety of cyclists between them and more data was needed to examine whether this hypothesis was true. These findings will be discussed in a future article.

Even roadways that do not contain a cycling lane exhibit differences in the percentage of cyclists riding on a sidewalk. Higher sidewalk usage has been previously observed on Hamilton Road and even more so on Dundas Street between Highbury Ave and Clarke Road. Yet cyclist fatalities have been reported recently on both Hamilton Road and Dundas Street and it is suspected that those occurred when cyclists were riding in a shared lane with motor vehicle traffic and not riding on a sidewalk. Unfortunately officials such as police have never revealed how these fatalities occurred.

Cyclist Helmet Use

Although not reported here, cyclist helmet use is also being tabulated during these observations. The data from 2025 has not yet been compiled. The most recent calculations are for 2024 and these have shown that the percentage of males not wearing helmets was 65.99%, while the percentage for females was 53.29%.

Much like seat-belts cycling helmets need to be worn properly to be effective. Collisions can introduce large forces, including rotations of the head. When a helmet is worn loosely it can be dislodged or thrown off completely by impact forces, making the helmet of little benefit.

There are several practical problems with helmet use. Some riders have complained that helmets are too expensive. Others find them too hot in summertime and too cold in winter. These issues are never discussed in the official circles of London Ontario yet they influence non-usage and therefore increase the severity of injury during a collision or other mishap.

Cyclists Riding Through Pedestrians Crossings

In the last 4 years (2022-25) Gorski Consulting has been documenting the numbers of cyclists passing through pedestrian crossings. Cyclists are told that, if they approach a pedestrian crossing they need to dismount and walk their bike across. But the reality is far different. For example, in the past four years 359 cyclists were observed in a pedestrian crossing. Of those only 42 actually walked their cycle through the crossing. A total of 88.3 % of cyclists rode through the crossing. This finding was consistent across all four years. An additional finding is that those cyclists who enter a pedestrian crossing do so, almost exclusively, from riding on a sidewalk.

A very rare sighting: A female but also one who is walking her bike through a pedestrian crossing.

Cyclists do not realize that when collisions occur and matters reach civil litigation lawyers are quick to use the cyclist’s riding in a pedestrian crossing as contributory negligence and therefore a substantial portion of the cyclists claim will be deducted by a judge. Given the very large percentage of cyclists that ride through a pedestrian crossing this becomes an easy attack against cyclists.

Cargo Bikes

Officially we understand that cargo bikes are a class of cycles that are manufactured to carry cargo along with the cyclist. A view of such cycle is shown below.

While cargo bikes like the one shown here are ridden on the streets of London they are far less common than the improvised ones as shown in the next image.
This is cargo bike reality. Many more riders make improvisations to carry cargos using regular cycles. While a wagon attachment shown here can be “OK”, complications can occur with respect to steering, braking and balance that could subject a cyclist to greater dangers.

Far more cyclists are seen with improvisations that include attachments of mini-trailers, wagons and even golf carts. These need to be recognized and considered when developing a strategy for improving cyclist safety in London.

Summary

Cyclist observations are the only source of objective data that the public can obtain about what is taking place with cycling in London, Ontario. The point of such observations is to assess whether the cycling mode of transportation is increasing as per the needs to fight climate change. But these observations are also the only objective information that the public can use to evaluate cyclist safety in the City of London. If transparency existed, like it should, the public would be provided with much deeper and relevant information by police, city staff, news media and by hospitals that receive injured cyclists. That is not happening. In fact, on the few occasions when cyclist collisions are reported, they either involve fatal, or serious injuries to the cyclist. But nothing of relevance is revealed as to how the event occurred or what factors were at play. This leads to fatalities and injuries that recur, over and over again, as cyclists and drivers do not understand how they could improve their safety.

The best intervention we can muster is to erect “ghost bikes” at locations where cyclists have been killed. How and why they were killed is never demanded from authorities who never release such important facts.

Archives

Recent Posts