![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_8909-Cropped2.jpg?resize=1024%2C580&ssl=1)
The City of London Ontario made a declaration of a climate emergency a few years ago. This was supposed to be a wake up call. Our habits needed to change and this included the way we travel. This was good political posturing that stumbled in its application. A need to increase the cycling mode of transportation from 1% to 25% was advised by one of the City’s advisory committees. This was later downgraded to about 5% by City politicians. Never-the-less a 500% increase in the cycling population was an ambitious goal. Some increases in cycling were noted over the last several years but nothing compared to the City’s goal.
Where the City’s ambitions “failed” can be seen in the example of the cycling lane recently created on Brydges/Wavell Streets in east London. In the following we present a history of the site’s collisions, how the cycling lane became created and what special safety problems still exist for cyclists and drivers of motor vehicles. Cyclists need to know that some portions of protected cycling lanes are not protective and this is demonstrated in this review.
Historical Review of Brydges/Wavell Site
The Googlemaps graphic below shows the site of the Brydges/Wavell roadway with respect to the boundaries of the City of London. As a collector road it runs parallel to the main arterial roadway of Dundas Street which is located about 800 metres to the north. A parallel, arterial road, Trafalgar Road, is also a similar distance to the south. We cannot read the minds of the City staff or politicians who recommended this cycling installation, as much of these decisions are cloaked in secrecy. However it may have been reasoned that this new installation would take cyclists away from these busy roads where no cycling infrastructure exists.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/London-Overall-with-Circle-at-Brydges-Site.jpg?resize=1024%2C507&ssl=1)
An aerial, Googlemaps view of the western portion of the Brydges/Wavell site is shown below.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Aerial-1.jpg?resize=1024%2C551&ssl=1)
Collisions had a history of occurring at the two curves of the site. To the west there was a curve at Cornish Street and to the east there was a second curve at Spruce Street. This should not have been surprising since someone with collision reconstruction experience would know that there is a greater likelihood of a single-vehicle exit from a roadway wherever there is such a curve.
Many collisions occurred when eastbound vehicles on Brydges Street approached the curve at Cornish and failed to pass through the curve, crashing into roadside obstacles on the south side of the curve. An example of this is shown in the following photos below.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_0646-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C563&ssl=1)
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_0650-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C559&ssl=1)
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_0824-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C585&ssl=1)
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_0815-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C621&ssl=1)
The existence of the curve at Cornish is not the only issue. The City of London has demonstrated that its lack of attention to maintenance has exacerbated the problem. For example, when a utility pole was struck down on approach to the curve by an eastbound vehicle the City failed to detect that a “curve warning” sign, which was originally attached to the pole, was not reattached. While such signs are not monumental in collision prevention they are helpful to drivers who pay attention that they are approaching a curve. This is another example of the lack of accountability by the City of safety hazards that they create.
A precarious situation also existed for many years at the curve of Brydges/Wavell and Spruce Street. Road surface repairs were partially completed at the curve in 2013 leaving a patch of bumpy pavement. This was more important because, as vehicles passed through the curve they required a pavement with consistent traction so that it would not contribute to a loss of control of the vehicle. Furthermore signage, required to warn drivers of the surface condition, was not installed for many months.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Jan-31-14-Crossing-Guard-at-curve.jpg?resize=1024%2C576&ssl=1)
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Feb-6-14-View-of-incomplete-road-surface-repair-at-curve-1.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&ssl=1)
Oblivious to the potential danger, school crossing guards often positioned themselves at the outside of the curve, sometimes sitting in a lawn chair, as shown in the example below.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Nov-25-13-Crossing-Guard-sitting-on-lawn-chair-at-curve.jpg?resize=1024%2C579&ssl=1)
Subsequent to the photo shown above, two days later, on November 27, 2013, a vehicle went out of control on the curve. It struck a sand box only a few feet from where the school crossing guard was positioned. A sign post was also struck and damaged as shown in the two photos below.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Nov-27-13-Sand-box-struck-at-curve.jpg?resize=1024%2C683&ssl=1)
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Nov-27-13-Sign-post-struck-down-at-curve.jpg?resize=1024%2C589&ssl=1)
It is unknown whether city officials were paying attention to these collisions. However Speed Display Boards (SDBs) were installed on the road segment in the spring of 2011 and also in the spring of 2020. The photo below shows the SDB installed in April of 2020.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_9862-Cropped2.jpg?resize=1024%2C534&ssl=1)
It is not clear whether City officials gained any guidance from the SDB data. However, in September of 2021 Brydges/Wavell began to see construction taking place as a new cycling lane was being installed.
A disaster was averted early in the construction process when work crews removed the centre-line marking of Brydges east of Hale Street, as shown in the photo below from September 12, 2021. While the new centre-line was painted the old centre-line was not completely removed so many drivers attempted to follow the guidance of the original centre-line, thus placing their vehicles on the wrong side of the road.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_0914-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C569&ssl=1)
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_0939-Cropped.jpg?resize=992%2C532&ssl=1)
The construction of the new cycling lane was done piecemeal. Some segments were completed while other portions of Brydges/Wavell remained untouched. The progress of the construction can be seen from the several photos shown below, taken April 3, 2022.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_3976-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C542&ssl=1)
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_3980-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C578&ssl=1)
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_3990-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C568&ssl=1)
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_4002-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C538&ssl=1)
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_4016-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C552&ssl=1)
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_4023-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C557&ssl=1)
Protected Cycling Lane Corrections At Cornish Curve
By August of 2022 the cycling lane along Brydges/Wavell Streets was substantially developed. At the Cornish Street curve curb blocks were installed on both sides of the curve. However there was evidence that the curb blocks were being struck, as shown in the following photo.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_5487.jpg?resize=1024%2C576&ssl=1)
The next photo, taken on August 11, 2022 shows a view looking eastward at the Cornish curve and the newly installed curb blocks are seen on both sides of Brydges Street.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_6622-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C584&ssl=1)
Evidence that the curb blocks were being struck by passing vehicles can be seen in the next photo where several of the curb blocks at the curve were removed and placed along the north curb. It is believed that this was because the blocks were being struck in the narrowed lane where drivers were having difficulty staying within the lane at the curve.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_8392-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C569&ssl=1)
Removal of the curb blocks also occurred on the south side of Brydges Street, as shown in the photos below.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_0598-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C572&ssl=1)
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_0600-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C582&ssl=1)
Subsequently, by March, 2024 the curb blocks on the south side of Brydges were reduced further as shown in the photo below.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_2758-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C548&ssl=1)
The removal of the curb blocks at the Cornish Street curve are a demonstration of the difficulties that drivers experienced in keeping their vehicles within the confines of the lane while travelling around the curve. While removal of the curb blocks prevented them being struck it did not solve the problem, and danger, that continued to exist at the curve. Cyclists believed they were safe while travelling in this “protected” lane but it was not explained to them that motor vehicles travelling around the curve were in jeopardy of travelling outside of their lane and possibly into the cycling lane at the precise location where the curb blocks were removed. Thus the cycling lane became unprotected precisely where that protection was needed the most. This is not a situation that is unique to this roadway and curve but it exists, in differing ways, wherever there is a horizontal curve along with a cycling lane. However this issue has not been publicly discussed.
Not all protected cycling lanes are the same nor do they provide an equal level of protection for cyclists. While the curb blocks existing along the cycling lane of Brydges/Wavell Streets provide some protection it is only limited. A motor vehicle travelling around a curve like the one at Cornish Street will not be redirected by the curb block in any large degree because those blocks are too low and of minimal mass. There are different protections provided in other jurisdictions such as the example shown in the next photo taken on Lakeshore Boulevard near the western edge of Toronto, Ontario.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_2895-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C575&ssl=1)
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_4258-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C617&ssl=1)
Cycle Counts – City of London Data
The City of London has installed a number of cycle counters primarily within cycling lanes. An example of such a counter is shown below.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_7612.jpg?resize=560%2C315&ssl=1)
Data from some of these counters is displayed on the City of London website. Data for the year 2024 for the Brydges-Wavell site is shown below with a comparison to six other counter sites.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Bike-Counter-Comparisons-6-sites-2004-Data.jpg?resize=318%2C303&ssl=1)
As shown above the “Wavell” site has counted the lowest number of cyclists. The word “combined” is not explained on the City’s website although it has been observed that two cycle counters have previously existed on the Brydges-Wavell site while the graphic on the website only shows a single counter. Never-the-less the general consensus is that the Brydges-Wavell site contains relatively low usage by cyclists. City data indicates that motor vehicle traffic volume along Brydges-Wavell Streets in approximately 10,000 vehicles per day, or 3.65 million vehicles per year. If the Brydges-Wavell site contains 27,732 cycle observations per year then the percentage of cyclists versus motor vehicles would be about 0.76%. This percentage is below the officially reported numbers for the cyclist mode of transportation in London which is about 1.0%. While this difference would not appear to be significant it is. Typically cyclist volumes are higher on roadways containing a cycling lane than roadways where no cycling lanes exist. So we should expect a cycling usage which is higher than average at the Brydges-Wavell site, not lower.
Summary
In the latest Mobility Master Plan the City of London claims that the current transportation modes of walking, cycling and mass transit are about 23%. It boasts that it will increase these modes of transportation to about 32% in about 25 years, as shown in the graphic taken from the Plan.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Picture1.jpg?resize=581%2C365&ssl=1)
The City has not provided any breakdown for the “current time” with respect to walking, cycling and mass transit. Nor has it provided any explanation for how any of the reported summaries were determined. While the City has created a number of cycling facilities it has not explained how it will increase the cycling mode along cycling lanes such as Brydges-Wavell. Presumably the Hollywood belief of “if you built it they will come” is closest to any scientific approach that exists.
Meanwhile Ontario’s Ford government has taken a hatchet to the cycling mode by forcing the removal of certain cycling lanes along major arterial roadways in Toronto. Ford claims that these cycling lanes are responsible for the traffic congestion in Toronto. Ford has also introduced legislation that will take decision-making away from municipalities as to when/where cycling lanes will be built to replace lanes used by motor vehicle traffic. He demonstrates that removal of cycling lanes will cause potential risks to cyclist safety and therefore he has also introduced legislation to prevent cyclists and their families from suing the Provincial government where the courts might determine that the Province was negligent in removing those cycling lanes.
These threats are particularly important to sites such as Hamilton Road in London where city staff and local politicians have shared the belief that motor vehicle traffic lanes should be removed from this arterial roadway to install cycling lanes. If the Province vetoes the local decision to install cycling lanes the plans for improving cyclist safety on Hamilton Road will become stagnant as no other options have been publicly aired.
The abandonment of cycling as a realistic alternative was exemplified in London, Ontario on December 3, 2024 when a large snowfall caused various plowing implements to hit the roadways to clear them. In the midst of this clearing a sidewalk plow was observed on Brydges-Wavell Street, as shown in the photo below. The sidewalk plow had been busy plowing the sidewalks of various side streets. As shown in the photo the sidewalk plow was then observed travelling westbound in the “cleared” westbound traffic lane of Wavell Street. Yet the cycling lane next to it was fully loaded with snow – not a single passage was made by a plow along the cycling lane to clear it for cyclist use.
![](https://i0.wp.com/gorskiconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/IMG_8961-Cropped.jpg?resize=1024%2C540&ssl=1)
The “chicken versus egg” argument is reiterated: “Well we don’t plow the cycling lane because no one uses it” and the cyclist alternative: “We will never use the cycling lane because you never plow it”.
The observable reality is demonstrated at the Brydges-Wavell site. This article has demonstrated that, over the years, many safety problems on this roadway have been misunderstood or simply ignored. Insufficient or poor maintenance has been at the top of the list and unaccountability for certain dangerous road construction practices has endangered the public. Yet certain design dangers have also never been revealed to the public. No individual or organization with any official standing has ever explained the special dangers that exist whenever a cycling lane exists next to a lane for motor vehicle travel and that roadway contains a curve. As seen at the Brydges-Wavell site the “protected” cycling lane has been altered at its curves so that the protection has been removed. And this removal exists precisely where cyclists need the protection the most. While the dangers at the Brydges-Wavell site are not monumental they represent what exists, realistically, along many roadways in London and the Province of Ontario. Not all protected cycling lanes are the same, and they do not provide protection along all lengths of a road segment. Cyclists are not informed of this. Cyclists continue to believe there is no difference in their protection because there is no information to inform them otherwise. And official agencies that ought to be informing cyclists about matters important to their safety simply do not do so because they have no obligation to do so.
You must be logged in to post a comment.